CT SMART GROWTH
...fighting sprawl and building communities...
(HOME)
|
| About |
- A blog for CT Smart Growth advocates
If you are new to this site, please read this:
WELCOME
|
|
CT SMART GROWTH
...fighting sprawl and building communities...
|
Konover
Mon May 05, 2008 at 11:09:32 AM EDT
|
|
1. GOOD NEWS FROM SHARE --
It's official! Konover Development no longer has the option to build River Oaks on the 60 acre CL&P property! This week the owner of the property told the SHARE Steering Committee that as of this past week he no longer has a contract with Konover Development and that he will now be taking direct responsibility for whatever gets built on his property and that he will only build something that both he and the town "can be proud of" (his words). He will not build a Big Box store on his property! Furthermore, he wants to work collaboratively with the town and the residents and he said that he supports the charrette initiative for his property stating that he will be an active participant in the planning process.
2. NEW DOT LEADER --
Connecticut is the third densest state in the country and 80 percent of its travel is by automobile, said Joseph Marie, the newly appointed Department of Transportation Commissioner. He said as commissioner, he will work to provide more attractive alternatives to the automobile. He will help commuters better predict transit travel times and provide more parking near transit. Marie will be the first transit expert to head the beleaguered agency. Marie was appointed by the Governor in April. His confirmation by the General Assembly is pending.
Marie has extensive public and private sector experience. He worked on the Central Phoenix/ East Valley Rail System, METRO TRANSIT in Minneapolis and for Bombardier and Siemens.
3. SMART GROWTH AND GLOBAL WARMING --
A new report by Environment Connecticut Clean Water Action of global warming trends in Connecticut and New England from 1990 to 2005 found that global warming emissions throughout New England increased by 10.9 percent. The study is the first of its kind to produce a thorough estimate of green house gas emissions.
In Connecticut, emissions from industrial and commercial sources declined 8.5 percent, but transportation emissions increased 20 percent between 1990 and 2005. Roads, parking lots and other impervious surfaces increased 22 percent in Connecticut between 1985 and 2002. On other words, there is a direct correlation between how and where we're developing and the amount of global warming gases we produce.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 08:32:21 AM EDT
|
|
It's been a while since I last posted. I am currently involved in fighting a proposed Lowes in Canton. At the same time I am cobbling together a coalition to host a charrette for my hometown so I don't have to fight anymore boneheaded big box proposals. Needless to say, I have been busy.
Anyways, good news out of Simsbury: last night the town's zoning commission denied Konover's PDD proposal. Hopefully, town leaders will now embrace a charrette for the town so citizens can show Konover what a mixed use development really looks like.
Is Simsbury's decision another sign that towns are learning to play it Smart?
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Tue Apr 08, 2008 at 09:32:09 AM EDT
|
|
Simsbury's Zoning Commission meeting was postponed last night because of an overflow crowd at Eno Hall. The meeting was to discuss the proposed Planned Development District (PDD) submitted by Konover so they can build their River Oaks project.
The meeting has been rescheduled for Thursday, April 10, and will be held at the Simsbury High School auditorium which can hold 900 people. Stay tuned!
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Thu Apr 03, 2008 at 09:46:55 AM EDT
|
|
Last night, both the Simsbury Design Review Board (DRB) and the Simsbury Planning Commission (PC) unanimously voted to recommend that the Zoning Commission deny the Konover PDD application. On April 7 the Simsbury Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing to determine whether or not the town should approve a Planned Development District (PDD) that would allow mixed-use development in town. Currently, mixed-use development is not permitted in Simsbury.
For the record, I believe in mixed-use development. However, a key component of mixed use development is human scale architecture. Call me crazy, but big box stores are not what I think of when I hear the words human scale architecture. Konover claims in their PR campaign for the PDD that the April 7 public hearing is not about whether one supports or opposes River Oaks, it's about whether one supports or opposes a PDD that is needed in order to bring mix-use economic development to Simsbury.
The April 7th public hearing absolutely IS about River Oaks! If the Konover PDD is approved it will provide the legislative framework in the form of a mixed-use zoning regulation under which Konover will submit their application to build River Oaks. I can't imagine that Konover paid substantial amounts of money in attorney and consultant fees to submit a PDD application just because they felt some form of civic duty to help Simsbury write PDD zoning regulations. It is all about Konover's bottom line. Building River Oaks will make them a profit, so they will do anything to make sure it gets built -- it is a simple as that.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sun Mar 23, 2008 at 15:53:01 PM EDT
|
|
In an effort to get their River Oaks project approved, Konover has submitted an application to the Zoning Commission for a Planned Development District (PDD) text amendment. If the Konover PDD zoning text amendment is approved by the six members of the Zoning Commission, then River Oaks will be built to Konover's specifications which will include a 130,000 sq ft big box store, another 60,000 sq ft grocery store plus additional retail, residential and commercial that will result in almost 1,000,000 total sq ft of building, 2,600 parking spaces, and at least 60% lot coverage.
I find it the height of arrogance and autocratic behavior that some elected officials in Simsbury are totally opposed to a collaborative, democratic process that provides a framework for creating a shared vision, otherwise known as a charrette, but are in favor of a corporation coming into town and proposing a zoning regulation that will benefit the bottom line of the same corporation. How much thought do you think Konover gave to the impact this PDD will have on the town as a whole? The answer is exactly none. The only thought was about the almighty dollar. Democracy has indeed been made a mockery by this entire River Oaks process!!
If this PDD passes, the people of Simsbury will have, for all intents and purposes, lost any remaining shred of control they had over land use decisions in their town. Corporations, with their legal teams and money, will now rule the town. Have a project that our zoning regulations -- regulations supposedly written by the people through their representatives -- don't allow? Just submit some alternative language that will make it acceptable and you will be bulldozing the land in no time.
Passage of this PDD will ensure that citizens will continue to lose faith in the process and in government in general at a time when we need more public participation and citizen involvement. Rather than stand up for the democratic process and the decisions of the people, far too many Simsbury officials have simply abdicated their responsibility. Is it any wonder people have no faith in government anymore?
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 232 words in story)
|
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 at 10:08:31 AM EST
|
|
Based on recent stories and op/eds, it appears Smart Growth is indeed starting to take center stage in Connecticut. In recent days, the New York Times, the Courant, and the New London Day have all highlighted the findings of the Responsible Growth Task Force and the various plans for bringing the DOT into the 21st century. And now today, I have learned that on Tuesday at 10:00 there will be a meeting in Speaker James Amann's conference room to convene a Smart Growth Working Group of legislators and stakeholders.
Yet, despite all the talk and discussion, the beat goes on for sprawl. Lowes has filed an application in Canton for the construction of a 148,000 sq.ft. store, Cheshire is getting closer to approving a "lifestyle center" on the outskirts of their town, Vernon is looking at the construction of a Home Depot, and Simsbury is bravely trying to stop the construction of another Konover big box proposal. I am sure there are a myriad of other examples of commercial sprawl in or near your hometown, not to mention the seemingly endless destruction of open space and farmland for residential housing that is going on throughout the state.
Talk is fine, but we need to take action. Contact your elected officials and urge them to support the recommendation of the Reponsible Growth Task Force and to push for overhauling the state's property tax structure. As a recent editorial in the Courant pointed out, "This is a defining moment. We can fake it and use responsible growth as marketing spin, or we can actually do business differently and save Connecticut's cities and countryside. Let's try the latter."
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 09:49:05 AM EDT
|
|
Last Friday, Tom Vincent, Simsbury Town Selectman, issued a press release announcing that he had asked Konover Development to withdraw their application for a new PDD (Planned Development District) zoning amendment as it was not in the best interest of the town. Yesterday, Monday, September 17, Konover complied and withdrew their application for the PDD zoning amendment.
However, there is more to the story.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 536 words in story)
|
|
Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 12:50:22 PM EDT
|
|
As I have mentioned in the past, when S/R Weiner first proposed the Shoppes in Canton they enticed people with renditions of a mixed used complex -- you know, the old fashioned Main St. with offices and apartments above the small businesses. Again, that is what they told us, but as soon as construction started the market, according to S/R Weiner, "forced" them to build big box stores and scrap their plans for any mixed use. Many of us, though we are unable to prove it, are convinced this was a classic bait and switch: promise something you have no intention of building to elicit support and then build what you really wanted from the very beginning.
I must say that I was extremely naive as I sat through all the presentations and zoning meetings. I thought our Zoning Commission would protect the town and say no to such drastic changes and obvious misprepresentation, but they quickly rolled over when push came to shove. I thought developers had some modicum of decency and act in good faith, but I soon learned scruples quickly go out the window when it comes to a company's bottom line.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 238 words in story)
|
|
Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 09:13:48 AM EDT
|
|
Just got back from vacation on Cape Cod -- great weather, but lots of traffic.
While catching up on my e-mails, I was greeted with an update on the River Oaks project in Simsbury. On June 5th, Konover submitted an application for River Oaks to the Town of Simsbury. The application consisted of three parts:
** zoning text amendment to establish a new zoning regulation in Simsbury for mixed-use development called a Planned Development District or PDD
** a request for a zone change for the CL&P property from its current zone of Light Industrial to a PDD zone and
** a site plan for River Oaks
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 209 words in story)
|
|
Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 09:43:43 AM EDT
|
|
Republican Selectman John Romano has called for a six-month moratorium on development while the town conducts the charette recommended by Victor Dover, a principal with the Florida-based Dover-Kohl Partners. Such a moratorium would require Konover to withdraw its River Oaks application.
Kudos to Mr. Romano. With so much pressure from developers to build on Route 10, especially in the northern and southern gateway areas, the town needs to take a step back and decided what type of development will benenfit the town as a whole. Interesting, though, that Mr. Romano's proposal "drew no response from fellow selectmen." What gives?
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Wed Jun 06, 2007 at 11:26:47 AM EDT
|
|
Yesterday, after 2 years of talking about it, Konover finally filed their River Oaks application with the town of Simsbury. Here are the lowlights:
1. Over a 1 millions square feet of buildings. About 75% of the West Farms Mall
2. The development still calls for a big box Target store.
3. Lot coverage is just shy of 70%. That means that about 70% of every square inch of the site is covered with impervious objects buildings, pavement, sidewalks, etc.
4. There will be 2,583 parking spaces or about 20% of the parking available at Gillette Stadium!
5. There will be 210 residences in the development which is a large new neighborhood all by itself.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 263 words in story)
|
|
Thu May 31, 2007 at 09:19:49 AM EDT
|
|
Just a few things I found interesting today:
1. Please take the time to sign the petition at Stop Griswold Overdevelopment. This virtual petition is to stop the development of land adjacent to Hammonassett State Park and protect the salt marshes, tidal rivers and Long Island Sound. The biological health and diversity of the state's coastal region affects us all. This public land is threatened with irreparable harm by real estate developers from New York. They propose to build a densely packed development of 127 residential units, mostly row houses and apartment buildings, directly adjacent to these sensitive tidal wetlands.
2. As reported a few days ago, a consultant from Dover-Kohl was hired to tour the site of the planned River Oaks project in Simsbury. As report in this morning's Courant,Victor Dover presented his report after his tour. His recommendations should be heeded by all towns:
The current draft of the town's 2007 plan of conservation and development fails to provide the framework that would help a developer devise a proposal consistent with what town leaders want for the town.
He likened regulations to DNA.
"If you have good DNA, you get good growth," Dover told commission members and the crowd of about 100 residents. "With bad DNA, you get cancer."
None of the projects cited by Dover as examples of good mixed-use development at the more than two-hour meeting Wednesday included big-box stores, which Dover said don't promote the sense of community and walkability that new urbanist design strives to promote.
Dover said, residents and land-use boards should address how the project would fit into their larger vision for the town. "River Oaks has everybody exercised right now, but one way or another River Oaks will get resolved and another [project proposal] will come along," Dover said.
"Waiting until after the applicant shows up is a really bad way to do this," he said. "What you really need to ask yourself is what will you be when you grow up."
What's happening in your town?
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Thu May 24, 2007 at 08:41:53 AM EDT
|
|
I received the below e-mail this morning. This River Oaks project gets more complex every day. I need to do some more research on Dover-Kohl and talk to some people about this so-called neutral company coming in to tour the site before I form an opinion about this, but my initial reaction is not good.
At the end of this past Mondays (May 21st) Zoning Commission meeting Hiram Peck, the Simsbury Director of Community Development, mentioned to the ZC that Dover-Kohl Partners (an Urban Design and Town Planning firm based in Florida) were all set to tour the River Oaks site followed by a public meeting next Weds, May 30th. Your SHARE steering committee has looked at the Dover-Kohl web site and while they have one design project which has a few favorable attributes, we are concerned that their focus appears to be on urban projects and incompatible with Simsbury's character. We are also suspect to the entire process, how the firm was chosen and retained, who decided this design consultation needed to be done, and the possible relationship of the design firm with Konover. The ZC appeared to have already known about this as they did not respond with any specific questions about what would be covered and how this had been set up (all they asked about were time & place to meet), however your SHARE steering committee members in attendance at the meeting were hearing about it for the first time.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 737 words in story)
|
|
Wed May 09, 2007 at 09:45:46 AM EDT
|
Yesterday I received two e-mails that summarized recent public meetings in Simsbury and Cheshire concerning proposed big box projects. Now, I have seen my share of developers' dog and pony shows over the years and listened to their focus-group filtered presentations that describe malls as "lifestyle centers" and parking lots as "parking fields," so you would think I would be pretty much immune to their disengenuous rhetoric. But after reading these e-mails, even I was surprised by the outright lies that came out of the mouths of representatives from S/R Weiner and Konover at these two meetings.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 557 words in story)
|
|
Sat Apr 28, 2007 at 09:56:31 AM EDT
|
|
On this past Wednesday, the developer of the proposed River Oaks project in Simsbury held a "pre-application" presentation to members of the four land use boards in town. No citizens were allowed to speak, but hundreds did attend.
I have commented before on Konover's co-optation of new urbanism in an effort to get this project approved, but their presentation on Wednesday night forces me to make some further comments.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 340 words in story)
|
|
Mon Apr 09, 2007 at 14:40:38 PM EDT
|

The New England town meeting is revered as the epitomy of democratic debate and decision making. Townspeople turn out to voice their opinion on everything from dog catcher to multi-million dollar expenditures, secure in the knowledge that although their viewpoint may not have prevailed in the end, the decision making process was open and fair to all.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1408 words in story)
|
|
Fri Apr 06, 2007 at 10:29:54 AM EDT
|
|
Konover Corp. has decided to pull the plug on a proposed $64 million retail complex project in Watertown. The reason: $58,000 for an impact study that the town requested Konover to fund.
Perhaps the real reason is the opposition to the project and the stink of corruption that has surrounded it. I will write more about this in a later diary, but for now, check out the Concerned Citizens of Watertown website for more information.
|
|
Discuss
:: (5
Comments)
|
|
Fri Mar 30, 2007 at 09:30:53 AM EDT
|
|
As previously reported, Konover has sued five citizens from Groton, along with the town, because of the decison by Groton's Planning commission to reject a proposed 200,000 sq. ft. Wal-Mart development.
This week, I has the pleasure of speaking with two of the citizens to get some background and insight as to why Konover has filed a lawsuit against them.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 252 words in story)
|
|
Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 12:55:58 PM EDT
|
|
This is the first in a ten part series on Smart Growth based on the ten smart growth principles:
1. Mix land uses
2. Take advantage of compact building design
3. Create a range of housing opportunities and choices
4. Create walkable neighborhoods
5. Foster distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place
6. Preserve open space, farmland, and critical environmental areas.
7. Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities
8. Provide a variety of transportation choices
9. Make development decisions predictable, fair, and cost effective
10. Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration in development decisions.
If you have heard the term smart growth and want to know what it actually looks like and how its principles have been applied in cities, suburbs, and small towns across the country, then read on.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 587 words in story)
|
|
Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 10:17:09 AM EST
|
|
Seems Konover forgot they had embraced New Urbanism when they submitted their 200,000 sq. ft. application for a new Wal-Mart in Groton, or maybe their representatives didn't get that memo.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 193 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
| CORPORATIONS ARE NOT HUMANS |
<
|
|